State of Kerala - Karukachal Police vs NAMUL GOGY S/O JIFHU GOGY, TINTING RAJGOR, DIVIGORA DIVIGORA ASSAm — 3715/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 3/181,146/196. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 16th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKT190026592025
Filing Number
304659/2025
Filing Date
08-11-2022
Registration No
3715/2022
Registration Date
19-05-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1376
Police Station
Karukachal Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Karukachal Police
Respondent(s)
NAMUL GOGY S/O JIFHU GOGY, TINTING RAJGOR, DIVIGORA DIVIGORA ASSAm
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
For Return of Summons
For Return of Summons
Repeat Summons
Show Casue to Investigating Officer
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For Return of Summons |
| 24-02-2026 | For Return of Summons |
| 04-02-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 17-01-2026 | Show Casue to Investigating Officer |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dropped proceedings against accused Namul Gogy for offences under IPC Section 279 and MV Act Sections 3(1)/181, 146/196, finding that despite repeated summons since November 2022, the accused could not be located at the provided address. The magistrate, applying Kerala High Court precedent, determined that the costs of locating the accused far exceeded the maximum fine imposable, satisfying conditions for proceedings cessation under Section 281 BNSS (formerly Section 258 CrPC). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dropped proceedings against accused Namul Gogy for offences under IPC Section 279 and MV Act Sections 3(1)/181, 146/196, finding that despite repeated summons since November 2022, the accused could not be located at the provided address. The magistrate, applying Kerala High Court precedent, determined that the costs of locating the accused far exceeded the maximum fine imposable, satisfying conditions for proceedings cessation under Section 281 BNSS (formerly Section 258 CrPC). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts