State of Kerala - Karukachal Police vs Suraj Raj(S/o.Rajappan, Karakkattu kunnel(H) — 3411/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 337,338,279. Disposed: Uncontested--PROCEEDINGS STOPPED U/S 281 BNSS on 07th May 2026.

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKT190026112025

Case disposed

Filing Number

304611/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2020

Registration No

3411/2020

Registration Date

19-05-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PROCEEDINGS STOPPED U/S 281 BNSS

FIR Details

FIR Number

1277

Police Station

Karukachal Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 337,338,279
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 134(A),(B)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala - Karukachal Police

Respondent(s)

Suraj Raj(S/o.Rajappan, Karakkattu kunnel(H)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

07-05-2026

Disposed

23-04-2026

For Return of Summons

31-03-2026

Adjourned

16-03-2026

For Return of Summons

27-02-2026

Repeat Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: ST 3411/2020 The Kanjirappally Magistrate Court dropped proceedings against Sooraj Raj, accused of rash driving and causing hurt (IPC §279, 337, 338; MV Act §134(A)(B)), because despite repeated summons since December 2020, police could not locate him at the provided address. The court found that the cost of continuing to search for the accused far exceeded the maximum penalty imposable, satisfying conditions under §258 Cr.PC for discontinuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST 3411/2020 The Kanjirappally Magistrate Court dropped proceedings against Sooraj Raj, accused of rash driving and causing hurt (IPC §279, 337, 338; MV Act §134(A)(B)), because despite repeated summons since December 2020, police could not locate him at the provided address. The court found that the cost of continuing to search for the accused far exceeded the maximum penalty imposable, satisfying conditions under §258 Cr.PC for discontinuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case