State of Kerala - Ponkunnam Police vs BASIL P MATHEW — 341/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: For Appearance of Accused. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

FIR - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT

CNR: KLKT190022702022

For Appearance of Accused

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

2270/2022

Filing Date

12-07-2022

Registration No

341/2022

Registration Date

14-07-2022

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

FIR Details

FIR Number

610

Police Station

Ponkunnam Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,34
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section State of Kerala - Ponkunnam PoliceRONY SEBASTIAN
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Exemption From Appearance Of Accused Section State of Kerala - Ponkunnam PoliceRONY SEBASTIAN

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala - Ponkunnam Police

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally

Respondent(s)

BASIL P MATHEW

RONY SEBASTIAN

MARTIN ANTONY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

05-06-2026

For Appearance of Accused

12-05-2026

For Appearance of Accused

06-05-2026

Orders In CMP

05-05-2026

For Reports

28-04-2026

For Appearance of Accused

Interim Orders

12-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: CMP 02/2026 in CC 341/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court exempted accused Rony Sebastian from personal appearance and permitted him to appear through his counsel during trial in the fraud case (IPC §420 r/w 34). The exemption is conditional on filing undertakings regarding identity non-dispute, counsel representation, special power of attorney, and compliance with examination procedures under §313(1)(b) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP 02/2026 in CC 341/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court exempted accused Rony Sebastian from personal appearance and permitted him to appear through his counsel during trial in the fraud case (IPC §420 r/w 34). The exemption is conditional on filing undertakings regarding identity non-dispute, counsel representation, special power of attorney, and compliance with examination procedures under §313(1)(b) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case