State of Kerala - Karukachal Police vs Akhil Shaji — 3689/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,146r/w196. Disposed: Uncontested--PROCEEDINGS STOPPED U/S 281 BNSS on 07th May 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKT190022272025
Filing Number
304227/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2019
Registration No
3689/2019
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PROCEEDINGS STOPPED U/S 281 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
1513
Police Station
Karukachal Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Karukachal Police
Adv. Government Advocate, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
Akhil Shaji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
For Return of Summons
Adjourned
For Return of Summons
Return of Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | For Return of Summons |
| 31-03-2026 | Adjourned |
| 16-03-2026 | For Return of Summons |
| 21-02-2026 | Return of Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST 3689/2019 The Kanjirappally Magistrate Court dropped proceedings against Akhil Shaji for traffic offenses (IPC §279, MV Act §185, 146, 196) under BNSS §281. Despite repeated summons issued since November 2019, police could not locate the accused at the provided address. The court found that the costs of continued efforts to secure his presence far exceeded the maximum fine prescribed, satisfying the criteria under §258 Cr.PC to terminate the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST 3689/2019 The Kanjirappally Magistrate Court dropped proceedings against Akhil Shaji for traffic offenses (IPC §279, MV Act §185, 146, 196) under BNSS §281. Despite repeated summons issued since November 2019, police could not locate the accused at the provided address. The court found that the costs of continued efforts to secure his presence far exceeded the maximum fine prescribed, satisfying the criteria under §258 Cr.PC to terminate the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts