State of Kerala - Manimala Police vs BIDHUN @ UNNI — 300185/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,324,34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 04th April 2026.
FIR - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
CNR: KLKT190012022023
Filing Number
1202/2023
Filing Date
01-04-2023
Registration No
300185/2023
Registration Date
01-04-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Manimala Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Manimala Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
BIDHUN @ UNNI
AMAL
SURESH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
NBW to CWS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 16-02-2026 | NBW to CWS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Bidhun @ Unni and Others (CC 185/2023) The court acquitted all three accused (Bidhun @ Unni, Amal, and Suresh) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) after the prosecution failed to establish its case. The key witnesses, including the informant/injured party, turned hostile during trial, with the informant claiming he could not identify the attackers due to darkness, while other witnesses denied witnessing the incident or giving statements to police. The prosecution abandoned examination of remaining witnesses due to lack of incriminating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Bidhun @ Unni and Others (CC 185/2023) The court acquitted all three accused (Bidhun @ Unni, Amal, and Suresh) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) after the prosecution failed to establish its case. The key witnesses, including the informant/injured party, turned hostile during trial, with the informant claiming he could not identify the attackers due to darkness, while other witnesses denied witnessing the incident or giving statements to police. The prosecution abandoned examination of remaining witnesses due to lack of incriminating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts