State of Kerala - Manimala Police vs Ajin T P — 189/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),447,323. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 08th April 2026.
FIR - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
CNR: KLKT190008582020
Filing Number
858/2020
Filing Date
21-05-2020
Registration No
189/2020
Registration Date
21-05-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
163
Police Station
Manimala Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Manimala Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
Ajin T P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
Adjourned
For Appearance of Accused
Order/Judgement
For Further Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Adjourned |
| 01-04-2026 | For Appearance of Accused |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | For Further Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajin T P (CC 189/2020) The court found Ajin T P guilty of voluntarily causing hurt under IPC Section 323 and sentenced him to release under the Probation of Offenders Act with admonition. However, the court acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 447 (criminal trespass), finding insufficient evidence that the location was a public place or that obscene words caused annoyance as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajin T P (CC 189/2020) The court found Ajin T P guilty of voluntarily causing hurt under IPC Section 323 and sentenced him to release under the Probation of Offenders Act with admonition. However, the court acquitted him of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 447 (criminal trespass), finding insufficient evidence that the location was a public place or that obscene words caused annoyance as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts