State of Kerala - Manimala Police vs Jyothir Das @ Jyothish — 100/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,324,506(ii),34. Status: For Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
FIR - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
CNR: KLKT190005042021
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
504/2021
Filing Date
01-03-2021
Registration No
100/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
Manimala Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Manimala Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
Jyothir Das @ Jyothish
Praveen E P
Sonumon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
For Evidence
Orders In CMP
For Objection and Hearing
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
NBW to CWS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | For Evidence |
| 12-05-2026 | Orders In CMP |
| 23-04-2026 | For Objection and Hearing |
| 10-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 16-03-2026 | NBW to CWS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 100/2021 The Assistant Public Prosecutor filed a petition under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 to recall two witnesses (CW8—a doctor, and CW9—an investigation officer) whose examination was necessary for a fair trial. The prosecution evidence had been closed on 10.04.2026 after these witnesses failed to appear despite summons issued in November 2025 and warrants in January 2026. The court allowed the petition, holding that the complainant's right to prove their case cannot be curtailed merely on grounds of trial delay, despite the accused's objection that the prosecution was unnecessarily protractin the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 100/2021 The Assistant Public Prosecutor filed a petition under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 to recall two witnesses (CW8—a doctor, and CW9—an investigation officer) whose examination was necessary for a fair trial. The prosecution evidence had been closed on 10.04.2026 after these witnesses failed to appear despite summons issued in November 2025 and warrants in January 2026. The court allowed the petition, holding that the complainant's right to prove their case cannot be curtailed merely on grounds of trial delay, despite the accused's objection that the prosecution was unnecessarily protractin the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts