Aravind M.C vs Akhil. K.O — 8/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 20th May 2026.
CP - COMMITAL PROCEEDING
CNR: KLKT190003472020
Filing Number
347/2020
Filing Date
12-02-2020
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aravind M.C
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
Akhil. K.O
Anish Mohan
Anoop K.O
Prejish
Anoop K.S
Mohanan @ Koodalloor Mohanan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
Orders In CMP
For Reports
Call For Report
Verify And Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Orders In CMP |
| 29-04-2026 | For Reports |
| 27-04-2026 | Call For Report |
| 04-04-2026 | Verify And Report |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMP 01/2026 in CC 60/2020 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate allowed the accused's petition and committed the case to the District & Sessions Court, Kottayam under Section 362 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: Although the charges (unlawful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by weapons under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324 r/w 34) are not exclusively triable by Sessions Court, this case arose from the same incident as a connected case (SC 28/2020) pending in Sessions Court. Following Supreme Court precedent (Sudhir v. State of M.P.), the magistrate exercised discretionary power to commit the case to ensure both related matters are tried together in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP 01/2026 in CC 60/2020 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate allowed the accused's petition and committed the case to the District & Sessions Court, Kottayam under Section 362 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: Although the charges (unlawful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by weapons under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324 r/w 34) are not exclusively triable by Sessions Court, this case arose from the same incident as a connected case (SC 28/2020) pending in Sessions Court. Following Supreme Court precedent (Sudhir v. State of M.P.), the magistrate exercised discretionary power to commit the case to ensure both related matters are tried together in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts