Soumya Mohan vs Pradeep Kumar P R Advocate - ARCHANA R PILLAI — 100061/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLKT170008182023

Call On

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-12-2023

Filing Number

100599/2023

Filing Date

11-12-2023

Registration No

100061/2023

Registration Date

11-12-2023

Court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally

Judge

1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21
Ea/2/2025 Classification : Section Soumya Mohan
Ea/3/2025 Classification : Petition Section Soumya Mohan
Ea/4/2025 Classification : Petition Section Soumya Mohan
Ea/5/2025 Classification : Petition Section Soumya MohanPradeep Kumar P R
Ea/6/2025 Classification : Petition Section Soumya MohanPradeep Kumar P R
Ea/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Soumya Mohan

Petitioner(s)

Soumya Mohan

Adv. BILU G

Respondent(s)

Pradeep Kumar P R Advocate - ARCHANA R PILLAI

Prasad P R

Bindhumol P R

Nagarani T

Sree Ram ( Addl. JD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

20-05-2026

Call On

07-04-2026

For Hearing

27-03-2026

For Hearing

23-03-2026

Call On

16-03-2026

Call On

Interim Orders

05-11-2025
Order
11-12-2025
Order
01-11-2025
Order
02-12-2025
Order
11-08-2025
Order
05-04-2025
Order

Case Summary: 100061/2023 Case: E.A 1/2023 in E.P 61/2023 in O.S 285/2019, Court of Munsiff, Kanjirappally Outcome: Execution petition dismissed. The court found that the scheduled property subject to attachment does not belong to any of the judgment debtors. The Amin (court officer) returned the attachment order with the Village Officer's report confirming the property has been transferred to another person, leaving no basis for property attachment. The court therefore declined to proceed with execution of the decree against the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100061/2023 Case: E.A 1/2023 in E.P 61/2023 in O.S 285/2019, Court of Munsiff, Kanjirappally Outcome: Execution petition dismissed. The court found that the scheduled property subject to attachment does not belong to any of the judgment debtors. The Amin (court officer) returned the attachment order with the Village Officer's report confirming the property has been transferred to another person, leaving no basis for property attachment. The court therefore declined to proceed with execution of the decree against the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case