Mathew vs Mathew K J Advocate - R Rahul, Sujith Kumar T U, Sujith Kumar T UChristinemathew, — 100323/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 30th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT170007622023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-11-2023

Filing Number

100560/2023

Filing Date

15-11-2023

Registration No

100323/2023

Registration Date

15-11-2023

Court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally

Judge

1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED WITH COST

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Section Mathew

Petitioner(s)

Mathew

Adv. MURALIDHAR D

Respondent(s)

Mathew K J Advocate - R Rahul, Sujith Kumar T U, Sujith Kumar T UChristinemathew,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

30-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/Judgement

16-03-2026

Call On

04-03-2026

For Hearing

19-02-2026

Defence Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: O.S. 323/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff's Court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Mathew, holding him entitled to recover ₹1,94,000 (after deducting the ₹1 lakh security deposit) from defendant Mathew K.J. as arrears of rent with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the defendant's counterclaims about Covid-related rent exemptions and business obstruction, finding them unsubstantiated. The defendant admitted vacating the shop room and acknowledged rent arrears since April 2020. Previous Rent Control Court proceedings had already ordered the defendant to pay arrears of ₹2,09,000, with the appellate court dismissing his appeal, establishing the debt's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 323/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff's Court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Mathew, holding him entitled to recover ₹1,94,000 (after deducting the ₹1 lakh security deposit) from defendant Mathew K.J. as arrears of rent with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the defendant's counterclaims about Covid-related rent exemptions and business obstruction, finding them unsubstantiated. The defendant admitted vacating the shop room and acknowledged rent arrears since April 2020. Previous Rent Control Court proceedings had already ordered the defendant to pay arrears of ₹2,09,000, with the appellate court dismissing his appeal, establishing the debt's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case