Mathew vs Mathew K J Advocate - R Rahul, Sujith Kumar T U, Sujith Kumar T UChristinemathew, — 100323/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 30th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT170007622023
e-Filing Number
15-11-2023
Filing Number
100560/2023
Filing Date
15-Nov-2023
Registration No
100323/2023
Registration Date
15-Nov-2023
Court
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Judge
1-Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED WITH COST
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mathew
Adv. MURALIDHAR D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mathew K J Advocate - R Rahul, Sujith Kumar T U, Sujith Kumar T UChristinemathew,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 323/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff's Court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Mathew, holding him entitled to recover ₹1,94,000 (after deducting the ₹1 lakh security deposit) from defendant Mathew K.J. as arrears of rent with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the defendant's counterclaims about Covid-related rent exemptions and business obstruction, finding them unsubstantiated. The defendant admitted vacating the shop room and acknowledged rent arrears since April 2020. Previous Rent Control Court proceedings had already ordered the defendant to pay arrears of ₹2,09,000, with the appellate court dismissing his appeal, establishing the debt's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
25-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
16-Mar-2026
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
04-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
13-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
09-Feb-2026
For Cross Examination
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
22-Nov-2025
Listed to
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
28-Oct-2025
Pre Trial Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
06-Oct-2025
Pre Trial Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
04-Aug-2025
Bcf and Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
07-Jul-2025
Bcf and Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
22-May-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
24-Mar-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
29-Jan-2025
Report on Mediation
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
02-Dec-2024
Report on Mediation
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Oct-2024
Report on Mediation
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
18-Jun-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
25-Mar-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
17-Jan-2024
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
15-Dec-2023
For Objection
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
15-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100323/2023
Case Summary: O.S. 323/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff's Court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Mathew, holding him entitled to recover ₹1,94,000 (after deducting the ₹1 lakh security deposit) from defendant Mathew K.J. as arrears of rent with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the defendant's counterclaims about Covid-related rent exemptions and business obstruction, finding them unsubstantiated. The defendant admitted vacating the shop room and acknowledged rent arrears since April 2020. Previous Rent Control Court proceedings had already ordered the defendant to pay arrears of ₹2,09,000, with the appellate court dismissing his appeal, establishing the debt's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts