Radhika Balachandran vs Sindhu T Advocate - A K Kuriakose — 100315/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 30th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT170007522023

Case disposed

Filing Number

100547/2023

Filing Date

09-11-2023

Registration No

100315/2023

Registration Date

09-11-2023

Court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally

Judge

1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Section Radhika BalachandranSindhu T
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Section Radhika BalachandranSindhu T

Petitioner(s)

Radhika Balachandran

Adv. GIRISH S NAIR

Respondent(s)

Sindhu T Advocate - A K Kuriakose

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

30-03-2026

Disposed

21-03-2026

For Hearing

16-03-2026

Call On

03-03-2026

Return of Notice

20-01-2026

Listed to

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: O.S. 315/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff court granted a partial decree in favor of Radhika Balachandran. The court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendant Sindhu T. from trespassing into the plaintiff's property (a room used for business) and obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. The plaintiff was also awarded suit costs against the defendant. Key Reasoning: The court found that the plaintiff had clear title and ownership of the property through a valid sale deed, while the defendant was merely a licensee who had defaulted on monthly rent payments and vacated the property on 31 July 2023. The defendant's removal of all movables from the premises meant the plaintiff's apprehension of potential future trespass was reasonable and justified the injunction, though a mandatory injunction was denied since all disputed movables had already been removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

09-11-2023
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 315/2023 Court Decision: The Munsiff court granted a partial decree in favor of Radhika Balachandran. The court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendant Sindhu T. from trespassing into the plaintiff's property (a room used for business) and obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. The plaintiff was also awarded suit costs against the defendant. Key Reasoning: The court found that the plaintiff had clear title and ownership of the property through a valid sale deed, while the defendant was merely a licensee who had defaulted on monthly rent payments and vacated the property on 31 July 2023. The defendant's removal of all movables from the premises meant the plaintiff's apprehension of potential future trespass was reasonable and justified the injunction, though a mandatory injunction was denied since all disputed movables had already been removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case