Janaki vs Gopalakrishna Panicker Advocate - HARINDRA MOHAN NAIR — 100102/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1,2,4,6. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST. on 31st March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT170001272019
Filing Number
100102/2019
Filing Date
01-Apr-2019
Registration No
100102/2019
Registration Date
01-Apr-2019
Court
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Judge
1-Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST.
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Janaki
Adv. NINAN K. SCARIA.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gopalakrishna Panicker Advocate - HARINDRA MOHAN NAIR
-
2.Reji
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Case 100102/2019 (O.S. 102/2019) The court dismissed Janaki's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendant Gopalakrishna Panicker. Janaki claimed a 50+ year-old 8-foot pathway on defendant's property was her only vehicular access, allegedly widened to 12 feet in 2015-2016 through an oral agreement with a third party developer. The court found that Janaki failed to produce credible evidence of the pre-existing pathway's existence or any enforceable right over defendant's property, which remained exclusively his. The court noted surveyor plans confirmed the disputed road was part of defendant's land, and a public 4-foot panchayat road provided alternative access to Janaki's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
28-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
24-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
16-Mar-2026
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
13-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
11-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
06-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
15-Jan-2026
For Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
07-Jan-2026
For Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
08-Dec-2025
For Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Nov-2025
For Cross Examination
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
18-Nov-2025
For Additional Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
17-Nov-2025
For Objection
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
06-Nov-2025
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
11-Sep-2025
Listed to
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
09-Sep-2025
For Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
18-Aug-2025
Orders In IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
21-Jul-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
08-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
17-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
28-May-2025
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
07-Apr-2025
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Mar-2025
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
13-Feb-2025
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
04-Jan-2025
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
03-Dec-2024
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
02-Nov-2024
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
14-Oct-2024
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
24-Aug-2024
For Hearing on IA
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
23-Jul-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
06-Jul-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
20-Jun-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
27-May-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
23-Feb-2024
For Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Jan-2024
Verify And Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
05-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
22-Dec-2023
For Objection and Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
05-Dec-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
10-Nov-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
31-Oct-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
05-Oct-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
25-Sep-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
22-Aug-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Jul-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Jun-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-May-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
29-Mar-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
22-Feb-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
17-Jan-2023
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
05-Dec-2022
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Dec-2022
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
05-Nov-2022
For Commission Report
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-Oct-2022
Pre Trial Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Oct-2022
Adjourned
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Sep-2022
Pre Trial Steps
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
11-Jul-2022
With Connected Case
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
02-Jun-2022
Issues
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
18-Mar-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
27-Jan-2022
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
01-Dec-2021
Call On
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
28-Oct-2021
Exparte Evidence
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
23-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
19-May-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
04-Mar-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
14-Jan-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
02-Nov-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
26-Aug-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
29-May-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
03-Mar-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
03-Dec-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
03-Sep-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff, Kanjirappally
-
03-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 100102/2019
Summary of Case 100102/2019 (O.S. 102/2019) The court dismissed Janaki's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendant Gopalakrishna Panicker. Janaki claimed a 50+ year-old 8-foot pathway on defendant's property was her only vehicular access, allegedly widened to 12 feet in 2015-2016 through an oral agreement with a third party developer. The court found that Janaki failed to produce credible evidence of the pre-existing pathway's existence or any enforceable right over defendant's property, which remained exclusively his. The court noted surveyor plans confirmed the disputed road was part of defendant's land, and a public 4-foot panchayat road provided alternative access to Janaki's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts