State of Kerala - Ettumanoor Police vs AJI — 1987/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,294(b),341,324,506(ii),34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKT160059652016

Filing Number

1987/2016

Filing Date

04-Oct-2016

Registration No

1987/2016

Registration Date

04-Oct-2016

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Ettumanoor

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1286

Police Station

Ettumanoor Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 452,294(b),341,324,506(ii),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala - Ettumanoor Police

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 1, Ettumanoor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJI

  2. 2.DEEPA

  3. 3.ANJANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Aji, Deepa, and Anjana (1987/2016) The Ettumanoor First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Aji, Deepa, and Anjana) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's sole witness turned hostile and failed to identify the accused as the assailants despite admitting an attack occurred; the prosecution adduced no corroborating evidence, and the matter had been settled out of court, resulting in insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  16. 10-Jul-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  17. 03-Jun-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  19. 07-Apr-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  21. 30-Dec-2024

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  22. 20-Nov-2024

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Ettumanoor

  23. 04-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 04-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1987/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Aji, Deepa, and Anjana (1987/2016) The Ettumanoor First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Aji, Deepa, and Anjana) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's sole witness turned hostile and failed to identify the accused as the assailants despite admitting an attack occurred; the prosecution adduced no corroborating evidence, and the matter had been settled out of court, resulting in insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case