State of Kerala - Ettumanoor Police vs AJI — 1987/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,294(b),341,324,506(ii),34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKT160059652016
Filing Number
1987/2016
Filing Date
04-10-2016
Registration No
1987/2016
Registration Date
04-10-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Ettumanoor
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - I, ETTUMANOOR
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1286
Police Station
Ettumanoor Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Ettumanoor Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 1, Ettumanoor
Respondent(s)
AJI
DEEPA
ANJANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - I, ETTUMANOOR
Disposed
Order/Judgement
To Summon Witness
To Summon Witness
NBW to CWS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-02-2026 | To Summon Witness |
| 28-01-2026 | To Summon Witness |
| 08-01-2026 | NBW to CWS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Aji, Deepa, and Anjana (1987/2016) The Ettumanoor First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Aji, Deepa, and Anjana) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's sole witness turned hostile and failed to identify the accused as the assailants despite admitting an attack occurred; the prosecution adduced no corroborating evidence, and the matter had been settled out of court, resulting in insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Aji, Deepa, and Anjana (1987/2016) The Ettumanoor First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Aji, Deepa, and Anjana) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's sole witness turned hostile and failed to identify the accused as the assailants despite admitting an attack occurred; the prosecution adduced no corroborating evidence, and the matter had been settled out of court, resulting in insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts