State of Kerala - Kidangoor Police vs Biju Advocate - Manojkumar K.R — 201216/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKT160025172016
Filing Number
205674/2016
Filing Date
15-06-2016
Registration No
201216/2016
Registration Date
15-06-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Ettumanoor
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - I, ETTUMANOOR
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
487
Police Station
Kidangoor Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Kidangoor Police
Respondent(s)
Biju Advocate - Manojkumar K.R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - I, ETTUMANOOR
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For Hearing
Issue NBW
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | For Hearing |
| 18-04-2026 | Issue NBW |
| 08-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Magistrate acquitted accused Biju of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: an unexplained 8-day delay in filing the complaint, critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony (regarding incident location and injuries), contradictions between medical records and alleged injuries, and two prosecution witnesses turning hostile. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Magistrate acquitted accused Biju of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: an unexplained 8-day delay in filing the complaint, critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony (regarding incident location and injuries), contradictions between medical records and alleged injuries, and two prosecution witnesses turning hostile. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts