P.K.Sajeevan vs Vijayamma Advocate - K.Vinodkumar — 100211/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O7,R1. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT150003472022

Call On

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

Filing Number

324/2022

Filing Date

23-12-2022

Registration No

100211/2022

Registration Date

23-12-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor

Judge

1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 26,O7,R1
IA/14/2025 Classification : Section P.K.SajeevanVijayamma

Petitioner(s)

P.K.Sajeevan

Adv. P.T. Kunjachan

Respondent(s)

Vijayamma Advocate - K.Vinodkumar

Akhila

Anusha

Divya

P.K.Jayasree

Adv. K.Vinodkumar

P.K.Kusumakumari

Adv. K.Vinodkumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR

05-06-2026

Call On

26-05-2026

Order/Judgement

06-04-2026

Call On

25-03-2026

Stay Report

16-03-2026

Verify And Report

Interim Orders

09-10-2025
Order
23-10-2025
Order

Case Summary: P.K. Sajeevan v. Vijayamma & Others (100211/2022) Outcome: The application for interim mandatory injunction was dismissed. The Munsiff Court rejected the plaintiff's request to compel defendants to remove stone obstructions from a disputed pathway. The court found that since the plaintiff's right over the property in question remains contested and unproven—with defendants claiming exclusive ownership as Balakrishnan's heirs—the court cannot order removal of obstructions without first establishing the plaintiff's legal entitlement through full trial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.K. Sajeevan v. Vijayamma & Others (100211/2022) Outcome: The application for interim mandatory injunction was dismissed. The Munsiff Court rejected the plaintiff's request to compel defendants to remove stone obstructions from a disputed pathway. The court found that since the plaintiff's right over the property in question remains contested and unproven—with defendants claiming exclusive ownership as Balakrishnan's heirs—the court cannot order removal of obstructions without first establishing the plaintiff's legal entitlement through full trial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case