Rajimol Rajan vs Kerala State — 100193/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT150003072022
Filing Number
286/2022
Filing Date
16-11-2022
Registration No
100193/2022
Registration Date
16-11-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor
Judge
1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajimol Rajan
Adv. RAJESH C. MOHAN
Respondent(s)
Kerala State
Health Department
Medical college Hospital, Kottayam
Gynocology Department
Dr.Ajayakumar
Adv. M C Suresh
Radhamani
Adv. M C Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Verify And Report
For Further Hearing
Verify And Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Verify And Report |
| 07-03-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Verify And Report |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed plaintiff Rajimol Rajan's ₹10 lakh compensation claim against Medical College Hospital Kottayam and doctors for alleged medical negligence during delivery. The Munsiff court found that while the plaintiff suffered uterine rupture requiring emergency hysterectomy, she failed to prove negligent surgical conduct caused kidney injuries; medical records showed bladder integrity was verified via Methylene blue dye test and the emergency procedure was appropriate standard medical practice performed with reasonable care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed plaintiff Rajimol Rajan's ₹10 lakh compensation claim against Medical College Hospital Kottayam and doctors for alleged medical negligence during delivery. The Munsiff court found that while the plaintiff suffered uterine rupture requiring emergency hysterectomy, she failed to prove negligent surgical conduct caused kidney injuries; medical records showed bladder integrity was verified via Methylene blue dye test and the emergency procedure was appropriate standard medical practice performed with reasonable care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts