Anna Transposed as D5 vs James Thomas Advocate - Jose J Cheruvil — 100084/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order 7. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT150001642019
Filing Number
100084/2019
Filing Date
12-04-2019
Registration No
100084/2019
Registration Date
12-04-2019
Court
Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor
Judge
1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anna Transposed as D5
Adv. JOLLY JAMES, JOLLY JAMES
Aniyamma Wilson
Adv. JOLLY JAMES,Jolly
Mercy Saju
Adv. JOLLY JAMES,Jolly
Respondent(s)
James Thomas Advocate - Jose J Cheruvil
Mariamma Joseph
Adv. K Santhosh Kumar
C C Joseph
Adv. K Santhosh Kumar
Jimmy Joseph
Anna
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Disposed
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Call On
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Call On |
| 21-03-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 100084/2019 (OS 116/2018 and OS 84/2019) The court dismissed both suits filed by James Thomas and his sisters against their mother and each other regarding disputed properties. The court found that James Thomas failed to establish title through adverse possession, lacking proof of open, continuous, uninterrupted possession. Additionally, the court determined that the mother lacked absolute authority to transfer the jointly-owned properties to the sisters through the 1996 sale deeds, as her late husband's heirs were not parties to those transfers. Consequently, none of the plaintiffs obtained valid title to the claimed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 100084/2019 (OS 116/2018 and OS 84/2019) The court dismissed both suits filed by James Thomas and his sisters against their mother and each other regarding disputed properties. The court found that James Thomas failed to establish title through adverse possession, lacking proof of open, continuous, uninterrupted possession. Additionally, the court determined that the mother lacked absolute authority to transfer the jointly-owned properties to the sisters through the 1996 sale deeds, as her late husband's heirs were not parties to those transfers. Consequently, none of the plaintiffs obtained valid title to the claimed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts