Jose.N.J vs Joseph Thomas Advocate - Lithin Thomas — 100085/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O7,R1to7. Status: Stay Report. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Stay Report Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT150001322023

Filing Number

100121/2023

Filing Date

20-May-2023

Registration No

100085/2023

Registration Date

20-May-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor

Judge

1-Munsiff, Ettumanoor

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O7,R1to7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jose.N.J

    Adv. K.Vinodkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Joseph Thomas Advocate - Lithin Thomas

  2. 2.George Joseph

    Adv. Lithin Thomas,LITHIN

  3. 3.Thankamma George @ Thankamma

    Adv. Lithin Thomas,LITHIN

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-May-2026

    Stay Report

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Verify And Report

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Verify And Report

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Stayed Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    For Objection and Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    For Objection and Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  14. 01-Nov-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 100085/2023 Outcome: The application to exclude the counter-claim was allowed; the counter-claim is excluded. Key Issue: Plaintiff Jose N.J sought to exclude a counter-claim filed by defendants Joseph Thomas, George Joseph, and Thankamma George in a property dispute case involving trespass and injunction claims. Court's Reasoning: The Munsiff Court held that the counter-claim raises issues requiring resolution in a separate suit because necessary parties (prior property owners and defendants' siblings) cannot be impleaded. The counter-claim involves boundary fixation disputes unrelated to the plaintiff's title, requiring independent consideration that cannot be properly decided within this suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  17. 03-Oct-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    Orders In IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  19. 16-Aug-2025

    For Further Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  21. 05-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  22. 16-Jun-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  25. 05-Feb-2025

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  26. 06-Jan-2025

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  27. 27-Nov-2024

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  28. 24-Sep-2024

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  29. 16-Aug-2024

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  30. 12-Jul-2024

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  31. 20-Jun-2024

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  32. 03-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  33. 21-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  34. 15-Feb-2024

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  35. 19-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  36. 29-Nov-2023

    Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  37. 14-Nov-2023

    Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  38. 07-Nov-2023

    Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  39. 30-Oct-2023

    Bcf and Steps

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  40. 09-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  41. 12-Sep-2023

    Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  42. 05-Sep-2023

    Call On

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  43. 04-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  44. 26-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Ettumanoor

  45. 20-May-2023

    OrderView PDF

  46. 20-May-2023

    OrderView PDF

  47. 20-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 20-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100085/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100085/2023 Outcome: The application to exclude the counter-claim was allowed; the counter-claim is excluded. Key Issue: Plaintiff Jose N.J sought to exclude a counter-claim filed by defendants Joseph Thomas, George Joseph, and Thankamma George in a property dispute case involving trespass and injunction claims. Court's Reasoning: The Munsiff Court held that the counter-claim raises issues requiring resolution in a separate suit because necessary parties (prior property owners and defendants' siblings) cannot be impleaded. The counter-claim involves boundary fixation disputes unrelated to the plaintiff's title, requiring independent consideration that cannot be properly decided within this suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case