K.N.Mohanan vs Karunakaran Nair — 100004/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S.21O10,11,R32. Status: Stayed Call On. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKT150000432023
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
100040/2023
Filing Date
01-02-2023
Registration No
100004/2023
Registration Date
01-02-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor
Judge
1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.N.Mohanan
Adv. K.Vinodkumar
Sajikumar
Adv. K.Vinodkumar
Respondent(s)
Karunakaran Nair
Mahesh
Adv. JOSSY BASTIAN
Leela
Sivadas
Mahesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, ETTUMANOOR
Stayed Call On
Stayed Call On
Stayed Call On
Stayed Call On
Stayed Call On
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Stayed Call On |
| 16-03-2026 | Stayed Call On |
| 27-02-2026 | Stayed Call On |
| 14-01-2026 | Stayed Call On |
| 26-11-2025 | Stayed Call On |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100004/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed. Leela (additional third judgment debtor) filed an application challenging the maintainability of an execution petition in a property dispute case. She claimed ownership of item no.3 property via gift deed and contended that item no.5 pathway does not pass through her property, arguing the execution proceedings were invalid since she was not a party to the original ex-parte decree. The court dismissed her application, holding that the execution court cannot go beyond the decree's scope and her contentions should be raised through an appeal against the ex-parte decree (already pending as E.A 5/24). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100004/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed. Leela (additional third judgment debtor) filed an application challenging the maintainability of an execution petition in a property dispute case. She claimed ownership of item no.3 property via gift deed and contended that item no.5 pathway does not pass through her property, arguing the execution proceedings were invalid since she was not a party to the original ex-parte decree. The court dismissed her application, holding that the execution court cannot go beyond the decree's scope and her contentions should be raised through an appeal against the ex-parte decree (already pending as E.A 5/24). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts