JOMON AUGUSTINE vs JOBIN T JOSE — 304820/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED on 18th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKT120064222017
Filing Number
304820/2017
Filing Date
01-07-2017
Registration No
304820/2017
Registration Date
01-07-2017
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Pala
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOMON AUGUSTINE
Respondent(s)
JOBIN T JOSE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 304820/2017 Jomon Augustine v. Jobin T Jose The court convicted Jobin T Jose of issuing dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After purchasing a car from the accused for ₹4,35,000, the complainant discovered it was stolen property. Following a compromise, the accused issued three cheques (₹1,15,000, ₹50,000, and ₹1,50,000) as installment payments, all of which bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to respond or make payment, leading to conviction and sentencing across three cases with concurrent 6-month imprisonment terms and fines totaling ₹3,15,000, payable as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 304820/2017 Jomon Augustine v. Jobin T Jose The court convicted Jobin T Jose of issuing dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After purchasing a car from the accused for ₹4,35,000, the complainant discovered it was stolen property. Following a compromise, the accused issued three cheques (₹1,15,000, ₹50,000, and ₹1,50,000) as installment payments, all of which bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to respond or make payment, leading to conviction and sentencing across three cases with concurrent 6-month imprisonment terms and fines totaling ₹3,15,000, payable as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts