SI PALA vs PONNAMMA — 300579/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294B,506(II). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKT120059402017
Filing Number
300579/2017
Filing Date
18-07-2017
Registration No
300579/2017
Registration Date
18-07-2017
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Pala
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
2324
Police Station
Pala Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI PALA
Respondent(s)
PONNAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 24-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 20-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.579/2017 (SI PALA v. PONNAMMA) Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted 77-year-old Ponnamma of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words in public) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation), finding insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence. The court noted material inconsistencies: obscene words mentioned in court testimony were absent from the FIR, witness accounts conflicted regarding the accused's actions with a billhook, and no independent corroborating evidence existed. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and she was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.579/2017 (SI PALA v. PONNAMMA) Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted 77-year-old Ponnamma of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words in public) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation), finding insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence. The court noted material inconsistencies: obscene words mentioned in court testimony were absent from the FIR, witness accounts conflicted regarding the accused's actions with a billhook, and no independent corroborating evidence existed. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and she was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts