SAMBHUPRASAD vs SAHADEVAKUMAR K.P. — 304430/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 16th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKT120049332016
Filing Number
510830/2016
Filing Date
03-09-2016
Registration No
304430/2016
Registration Date
03-09-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Pala
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMBHUPRASAD
Respondent(s)
SAHADEVAKUMAR K.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1 PALA
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 304430/2016 Court Decision: The accused Sahadevakumar K.P. was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. He was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment and fined Rs. 1,00,000, with an additional one month imprisonment in case of default. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused issued the cheque to repay a borrowed amount, the cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds, and statutory requirements were complied with. The accused's bare denial of signature was insufficient to rebut the complainant's credible evidence supported by bank records and documentation. Probation provisions were not applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 304430/2016 Court Decision: The accused Sahadevakumar K.P. was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. He was sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment and fined Rs. 1,00,000, with an additional one month imprisonment in case of default. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused issued the cheque to repay a borrowed amount, the cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds, and statutory requirements were complied with. The accused's bare denial of signature was insufficient to rebut the complainant's credible evidence supported by bank records and documentation. Probation provisions were not applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts