Ramapuram Regional Service Co operative Bank Ltd. No. 4111 vs Ajesh Gopinath Advocate - BISSIMON C S, Sruthy Lakshmi Ajith — 100168/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R10,11. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKT100004632022
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
429/2022
Filing Date
06-10-2022
Registration No
100168/2022
Registration Date
06-10-2022
Court
Sub Court, Pala
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramapuram Regional Service Co operative Bank Ltd. No. 4111
Adv. AMAL VINCENT
Respondent(s)
Ajesh Gopinath Advocate - BISSIMON C S, Sruthy Lakshmi Ajith
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
Call On
For Steps
Sale
Sale
Sale
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Call On |
| 16-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 03-01-2026 | Sale |
| 02-12-2025 | Sale |
| 15-11-2025 | Sale |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 100168/2022 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed a Section 47 CPC petition filed by judgment debtor Ajesh Gopinath challenging the maintainability of execution petition EP 168/2022 filed by Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank. The court found no jurisdictional defect in the execution petition merely because an acknowledgment card proving service of the arbitral award was not produced. The court held that the Form 12 certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar sufficiently establishes that statutory formalities, including service under Rule 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules 1969, were complied with, and the belated challenge appeared to be an attempt to obstruct execution. The execution petition shall proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 100168/2022 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed a Section 47 CPC petition filed by judgment debtor Ajesh Gopinath challenging the maintainability of execution petition EP 168/2022 filed by Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank. The court found no jurisdictional defect in the execution petition merely because an acknowledgment card proving service of the arbitral award was not produced. The court held that the Form 12 certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar sufficiently establishes that statutory formalities, including service under Rule 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules 1969, were complied with, and the belated challenge appeared to be an attempt to obstruct execution. The execution petition shall proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts