Ramapuram Regional Service Co operative Bank Ltd. No. 4111 vs Ajesh Gopinath Advocate - BISSIMON C S, Sruthy Lakshmi Ajith — 100168/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R10,11. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKT100004632022
Filing Number
429/2022
Filing Date
06-Oct-2022
Registration No
100168/2022
Registration Date
06-Oct-2022
Court
Sub Court, Pala
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramapuram Regional Service Co operative Bank Ltd. No. 4111
Adv. AMAL VINCENT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajesh Gopinath Advocate - BISSIMON C S, Sruthy Lakshmi Ajith
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Mar-2026
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
For Steps
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Sale
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Sale
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Sale
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Sale
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Sale
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reports
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
23-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: Case 100168/2022 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed a Section 47 CPC petition filed by judgment debtor Ajesh Gopinath challenging the maintainability of execution petition EP 168/2022 filed by Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank. The court found no jurisdictional defect in the execution petition merely because an acknowledgment card proving service of the arbitral award was not produced. The court held that the Form 12 certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar sufficiently establishes that statutory formalities, including service under Rule 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules 1969, were complied with, and the belated challenge appeared to be an attempt to obstruct execution. The execution petition shall proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Aug-2025
For Reports
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Proclaim and Sell On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
28-May-2025
For Production of Documents/Affidavit
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
For Production of Documents/Affidavit
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Settlement of Proclamation
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Settlement of Proclamation
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Settlement of Proclamation
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
For Balance Statement
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
For Balance Statement
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
25-May-2024
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2024
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2023
For Steps
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2023
For Steps
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2023
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2023
For Objection and Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2023
Call with IA
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
Return of Notice
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100168/2022
Summary: Case 100168/2022 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed a Section 47 CPC petition filed by judgment debtor Ajesh Gopinath challenging the maintainability of execution petition EP 168/2022 filed by Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank. The court found no jurisdictional defect in the execution petition merely because an acknowledgment card proving service of the arbitral award was not produced. The court held that the Form 12 certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar sufficiently establishes that statutory formalities, including service under Rule 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules 1969, were complied with, and the belated challenge appeared to be an attempt to obstruct execution. The execution petition shall proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts