Siji Mary Thomas vs Shaji Mary Thomas Advocate - RAJESH S — 100032/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Adjourned Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT100003302023

Filing Number

100335/2023

Filing Date

20-Jun-2023

Registration No

100032/2023

Registration Date

20-Jun-2023

Court

Sub Court, Pala

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siji Mary Thomas

    Adv. MARTIN MATHEW

  2. 2.Gigi Mary Thomas @ Gigi Sebastian

    Adv. MARTIN MATHEW

  3. 3.Marykutty Thomas

    Adv. MARTIN MATHEW

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shaji Mary Thomas Advocate - RAJESH S

  2. 2.Dr. Mohan Paul

    Adv. K R SREENIVASAN,RAJESH S

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Stayed Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    With Connected Case

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Oct-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Prays Time

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    Further Evidence

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Order

    Case Summary: 100032/2023 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed an application (IA 13/2025) filed by plaintiffs Siji Mary Thomas, Gigi Mary Thomas, and Marykutty Thomas seeking to admit photocopies of two family settlement documents (dated 22.07.2017 and 25.11.1998) as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the prerequisites for secondary evidence—specifically, they did not prove the original documents' existence, execution, or custody with the defendants—and mere assertions without supporting material were insufficient. The court noted a prior dismissal of the plaintiffs' compulsion order petition on similar grounds, applying the same reasoning here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 19-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    For Objection and Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Order

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Order

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Order

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  17. 14-Aug-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  20. 01-Aug-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  21. 26-Jul-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    For Evidence

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  23. 07-Jul-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Order

  25. 01-Jul-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  26. 17-Jun-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  27. 13-Jun-2025

    Issue Notice

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  28. 06-Mar-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  29. 10-Dec-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  30. 08-Nov-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  31. 10-Oct-2024

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  32. 17-Aug-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  33. 18-Jul-2024

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  34. 09-Jul-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  35. 31-May-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  36. 12-Apr-2024

    Prays Time

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  37. 12-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  38. 11-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  39. 10-Oct-2023

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  40. 06-Oct-2023

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  41. 18-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  42. 14-Aug-2023

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  43. 14-Jul-2023

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  44. 29-Jun-2023

    Issue Notice

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  45. 20-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 20-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100032/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100032/2023 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed an application (IA 13/2025) filed by plaintiffs Siji Mary Thomas, Gigi Mary Thomas, and Marykutty Thomas seeking to admit photocopies of two family settlement documents (dated 22.07.2017 and 25.11.1998) as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the prerequisites for secondary evidence—specifically, they did not prove the original documents' existence, execution, or custody with the defendants—and mere assertions without supporting material were insufficient. The court noted a prior dismissal of the plaintiffs' compulsion order petition on similar grounds, applying the same reasoning here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case