Siji Mary Thomas vs Shaji Mary Thomas Advocate - RAJESH S — 100032/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT100003302023
Filing Number
100335/2023
Filing Date
20-Jun-2023
Registration No
100032/2023
Registration Date
20-Jun-2023
Court
Sub Court, Pala
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siji Mary Thomas
Adv. MARTIN MATHEW
-
2.Gigi Mary Thomas @ Gigi Sebastian
Adv. MARTIN MATHEW
-
3.Marykutty Thomas
Adv. MARTIN MATHEW
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaji Mary Thomas Advocate - RAJESH S
-
2.Dr. Mohan Paul
Adv. K R SREENIVASAN,RAJESH S
Case History
-
05-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Adjourned
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Stayed Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
With Connected Case
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Further Evidence
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Order
Case Summary: 100032/2023 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed an application (IA 13/2025) filed by plaintiffs Siji Mary Thomas, Gigi Mary Thomas, and Marykutty Thomas seeking to admit photocopies of two family settlement documents (dated 22.07.2017 and 25.11.1998) as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the prerequisites for secondary evidence—specifically, they did not prove the original documents' existence, execution, or custody with the defendants—and mere assertions without supporting material were insufficient. The court noted a prior dismissal of the plaintiffs' compulsion order petition on similar grounds, applying the same reasoning here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
For Objection and Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Order
-
21-Aug-2025
Order
-
21-Aug-2025
Order
-
21-Aug-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Call with IA
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2025
Call with IA
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
For Evidence
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Order
-
01-Jul-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Issue Notice
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2024
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Listed to
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2024
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Listed to
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2024
For Steps
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Prays Time
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
For Steps
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Issues
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
For Hearing
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Call On
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2023
Issue Notice
Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100032/2023
Case Summary: 100032/2023 The Sub Judge, Pala dismissed an application (IA 13/2025) filed by plaintiffs Siji Mary Thomas, Gigi Mary Thomas, and Marykutty Thomas seeking to admit photocopies of two family settlement documents (dated 22.07.2017 and 25.11.1998) as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the prerequisites for secondary evidence—specifically, they did not prove the original documents' existence, execution, or custody with the defendants—and mere assertions without supporting material were insufficient. The court noted a prior dismissal of the plaintiffs' compulsion order petition on similar grounds, applying the same reasoning here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts