Adithyan K R -minor vs Anish Kumar U — 101630/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,,166. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLKT090017632022

e-Filing Number

15-12-2022

Filing Number

1722/2022

Filing Date

15-Dec-2022

Registration No

101630/2022

Registration Date

15-Dec-2022

Court

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala

Judge

1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Adithyan K R -minor

    Adv. DON JOSE, TINU SCARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anish Kumar U

  2. 2.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. P T THOMAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    AwardView PDF

    Case Summary: Adithyan K R v. Anish Kumar U and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the minor petitioner's compensation claim filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, wherein he alleged he was hit by an auto-rickshaw driven negligently by the first respondent on 26.08.2022, causing severe injuries. The tribunal found that despite ample opportunities, the petitioner failed to produce any oral or documentary evidence to prove the negligence of the respondent, making it impossible to establish liability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Evidence

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  6. 30-Sep-2025

    Call On

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  7. 02-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  8. 14-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  9. 20-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  10. 08-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  11. 05-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  12. 25-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  13. 01-Apr-2024

    Adjourned

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  14. 30-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  15. 16-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  16. 11-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  17. 06-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  18. 02-May-2023

    Written Statement

    M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

  19. 13-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 15-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101630/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Adithyan K R v. Anish Kumar U and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the minor petitioner's compensation claim filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, wherein he alleged he was hit by an auto-rickshaw driven negligently by the first respondent on 26.08.2022, causing severe injuries. The tribunal found that despite ample opportunities, the petitioner failed to produce any oral or documentary evidence to prove the negligence of the respondent, making it impossible to establish liability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case