Adithyan K R -minor vs Anish Kumar U — 101630/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,,166. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.
OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLKT090017632022
e-Filing Number
15-12-2022
Filing Number
1722/2022
Filing Date
15-12-2022
Registration No
101630/2022
Registration Date
15-12-2022
Court
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala
Judge
1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Adithyan K R -minor
Adv. DON JOSE, TINU SCARIA
Respondent(s)
Anish Kumar U
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. P T THOMAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Disposed
For Evidence
Written Statement
Call On
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Written Statement |
| 30-09-2025 | Call On |
| 02-06-2025 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Adithyan K R v. Anish Kumar U and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the minor petitioner's compensation claim filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, wherein he alleged he was hit by an auto-rickshaw driven negligently by the first respondent on 26.08.2022, causing severe injuries. The tribunal found that despite ample opportunities, the petitioner failed to produce any oral or documentary evidence to prove the negligence of the respondent, making it impossible to establish liability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Adithyan K R v. Anish Kumar U and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the minor petitioner's compensation claim filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, wherein he alleged he was hit by an auto-rickshaw driven negligently by the first respondent on 26.08.2022, causing severe injuries. The tribunal found that despite ample opportunities, the petitioner failed to produce any oral or documentary evidence to prove the negligence of the respondent, making it impossible to establish liability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts