Rija Jose vs Shiny Sebastian Advocate - Biby John — 100924/2020

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,166. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 27th March 2026.

OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLKT090010262020

Case disposed

Filing Number

1017/2020

Filing Date

13-07-2020

Registration No

100924/2020

Registration Date

15-07-2020

Court

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala

Judge

1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AWARD PASSED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 140,166
IA/2/2024 Classification : Section Rija JoseShiny Sebastian

Petitioner(s)

Rija Jose

Adv. E V Mathew

Respondent(s)

Shiny Sebastian Advocate - Biby John

IFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co.Ltd

Adv. BENOY JOSE MATHEW

Hearing History

Judge: 1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala

27-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Order/Judgement

25-03-2026

Order/Judgement

16-03-2026

Order/Judgement

10-03-2026

Order/Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Award

Case Summary: OP(MV) 924/2020 - Rija Jose v. Shiny Sebastian & IFCO TOKIO The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹76,000 in compensation to Rija Jose (wife) for injuries sustained in a January 2020 scooter accident caused by the negligent driving of Respondent 1, with the insurance company (Respondent 2) held liable for payment. The tribunal found negligence based on the FIR and police charge sheet, and compensated for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain/suffering, and loss of amenities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-02-2025
Judgement
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OP(MV) 924/2020 - Rija Jose v. Shiny Sebastian & IFCO TOKIO The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹76,000 in compensation to Rija Jose (wife) for injuries sustained in a January 2020 scooter accident caused by the negligent driving of Respondent 1, with the insurance company (Respondent 2) held liable for payment. The tribunal found negligence based on the FIR and police charge sheet, and compensated for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain/suffering, and loss of amenities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case