Don J Varghese (Major) vs Moneesh Kumar E M Advocate - PRINCE JOSEPH, Jose Y James — 912/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 19th March 2026.
OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLKT090009722021
Filing Number
961/2021
Filing Date
08-10-2021
Registration No
912/2021
Registration Date
11-10-2021
Court
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala
Judge
1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AWARD PASSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Don J Varghese (Major)
Adv. BIJUMON K, BIJUMON K, JOSHY ABRAHAM
Respondent(s)
Moneesh Kumar E M Advocate - PRINCE JOSEPH, Jose Y James
Dishin C D
Adv. PRINCE JOSEPH,Jose Y James
The New India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. REJI THOMAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For Hearing
Further Evidence
For Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 04-03-2026 | For Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Further Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | For Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OP(M.V) No. 912/2021 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹1,02,700 to 15-year-old Don J Varghese for injuries sustained in a June 2021 accident caused by negligent motorcycle parking. The tribunal found the 1st respondent (motorcycle rider) liable based on FIR and police charge sheet alleging violations of IPC sections 279, 337, and 338; held the 2nd respondent (vehicle owner) vicariously liable; and directed the 3rd respondent (New India Insurance Co.) to pay compensation with 9% annual interest, having admitted valid insurance coverage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OP(M.V) No. 912/2021 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹1,02,700 to 15-year-old Don J Varghese for injuries sustained in a June 2021 accident caused by negligent motorcycle parking. The tribunal found the 1st respondent (motorcycle rider) liable based on FIR and police charge sheet alleging violations of IPC sections 279, 337, and 338; held the 2nd respondent (vehicle owner) vicariously liable; and directed the 3rd respondent (New India Insurance Co.) to pay compensation with 9% annual interest, having admitted valid insurance coverage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts