Arun Anto Mathew vs Joseph Joseph — 100245/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,166. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 16th March 2026.
OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLKT090002972022
e-Filing Number
26-03-2022
Filing Number
289/2022
Filing Date
26-03-2022
Registration No
100245/2022
Registration Date
26-03-2022
Court
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Addl. District & Sessions Court /Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pala
Judge
1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AWARD PASSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arun Anto Mathew
Adv. SAIJU P MATHEWS, BINOY JOSE
Respondent(s)
Joseph Joseph
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. C J SHAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-M A C T / Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pala
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
For Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | For Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Arun Anto Mathew v. Joseph Joseph & The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (100245/2022) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹33,000 in compensation to the petitioner after finding that the accident on 14.11.2021 resulted from the first respondent's rash and negligent driving. The insurer (second respondent) must pay the compensation to the third-party claimant first, though it can later recover the amount from the vehicle owner-driver due to his violation of policy conditions by driving without a valid license. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Arun Anto Mathew v. Joseph Joseph & The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (100245/2022) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹33,000 in compensation to the petitioner after finding that the accident on 14.11.2021 resulted from the first respondent's rash and negligent driving. The insurer (second respondent) must pay the compensation to the third-party claimant first, though it can later recover the amount from the vehicle owner-driver due to his violation of policy conditions by driving without a valid license. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts