Satheesan K vs VRL Logistics Ltd. Advocate - CHACKO P C — 100120/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96OrderXLIRule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLKT010044332023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-09-2023

Filing Number

101824/2023

Filing Date

18-09-2023

Registration No

100120/2023

Registration Date

18-09-2023

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96OrderXLIRule1
IA/1/2023 Classification : Section Satheesan KVRL Logistics Ltd
IA/3/2025 Classification : Section Satheesan KM/s VRL Logistics Ltd
IA/5/2025 Classification : Section Satheesan KVRL Logistics Ltd
IA/6/2025 Classification : Application For Admission Of Documents Section Satheesan KVRL Logistics Ltd
IA/1/2026 Classification : Amendment Application Section Satheesan KVRL Logistics Ltd

Petitioner(s)

Satheesan K

Adv. Roy George

Respondent(s)

VRL Logistics Ltd. Advocate - CHACKO P C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

26-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Orders In IA

13-03-2026

For Hearing

07-03-2026

For Hearing

24-02-2026

For Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Order
26-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Satheesan K v. VRL Logistics Ltd (I.A. No.1/2023 in A.S. No.120/2023) The District Court dismissed Satheesan K's petition seeking to condone a 2016-day delay in filing an appeal against a 2019 trial court judgment. The court found that Satheesan's explanation—that he had entrusted his counsel Adv. Reji Chacko with filing the appeal in March 2019, remained unaware of the advocate's death in 2021, and only discovered the unfiled appeal in 2023—was improbable and untrustworthy. The court held that a prudent litigant would naturally inquire about the appeal number within a reasonable timeframe, and Satheesan's failure to do so for nearly four years demonstrated wilful negligence and lack of bona fides, warranting dismissal under the stringent standard applicable to inordinate delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Satheesan K v. VRL Logistics Ltd (I.A. No.1/2023 in A.S. No.120/2023) The District Court dismissed Satheesan K's petition seeking to condone a 2016-day delay in filing an appeal against a 2019 trial court judgment. The court found that Satheesan's explanation—that he had entrusted his counsel Adv. Reji Chacko with filing the appeal in March 2019, remained unaware of the advocate's death in 2021, and only discovered the unfiled appeal in 2023—was improbable and untrustworthy. The court held that a prudent litigant would naturally inquire about the appeal number within a reasonable timeframe, and Satheesan's failure to do so for nearly four years demonstrated wilful negligence and lack of bona fides, warranting dismissal under the stringent standard applicable to inordinate delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case