Shriram Finance Limited vs Robin P. Baby Advocate - MANJU MANOHAR, SANAL KUMAR K P — 159/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act - 1996 Section Section 9 sub clause ii. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLKT010042572025

Filing Number

700/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

159/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - 1996 Section Section 9 sub clause ii

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram Finance Limited

    Adv. LITHIN THOMAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Robin P. Baby Advocate - MANJU MANOHAR, SANAL KUMAR K P

  2. 2.Manju Mol P.M

    Adv. MANJU MANOHAR,SANAL KUMAR K P

  3. 3.Vijo V

    Adv. MANJU MANOHAR,SANAL KUMAR K P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District Judge of Kottayam closed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, noting that arbitration proceedings had been initiated between the parties. The court directed that any attachment of the scheduled property would remain subject to the final decision of the Arbitrator, thereby preserving the rights of both parties pending the arbitration outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    For Reports

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Referred to Mediator

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Return of Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  11. 03-Jan-2026

    Report on Attachment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  12. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District Judge of Kottayam closed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, noting that arbitration proceedings had been initiated between the parties. The court directed that any attachment of the scheduled property would remain subject to the final decision of the Arbitrator, thereby preserving the rights of both parties pending the arbitration outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case