Shriram Finance Limited vs Robin P. Baby Advocate - MANJU MANOHAR, SANAL KUMAR K P — 159/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act - 1996 Section Section 9 sub clause ii. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 29th April 2026.
MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)
CNR: KLKT010042572025
Filing Number
700/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Finance Limited
Adv. LITHIN THOMAS
Respondent(s)
Robin P. Baby Advocate - MANJU MANOHAR, SANAL KUMAR K P
Manju Mol P.M
Adv. MANJU MANOHAR,SANAL KUMAR K P
Vijo V
Adv. MANJU MANOHAR,SANAL KUMAR K P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam
Disposed
Call On
For Reports
Referred to Mediator
Call On
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Call On |
| 16-04-2026 | For Reports |
| 04-04-2026 | Referred to Mediator |
| 30-03-2026 | Call On |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Kottayam closed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, noting that arbitration proceedings had been initiated between the parties. The court directed that any attachment of the scheduled property would remain subject to the final decision of the Arbitrator, thereby preserving the rights of both parties pending the arbitration outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Kottayam closed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, noting that arbitration proceedings had been initiated between the parties. The court directed that any attachment of the scheduled property would remain subject to the final decision of the Arbitrator, thereby preserving the rights of both parties pending the arbitration outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts