P M Thomas vs Saji Chacko Advocate - P S Vishnu — 100088/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLKT010038762022

e-Filing Number

24-11-2022

Filing Number

1360/2022

Filing Date

24-Nov-2022

Registration No

100088/2022

Registration Date

24-Nov-2022

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

4-Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43
Ia/1/2023 Classification : Section Saji ChackoP M Thomas
Ia/2/2024 Classification : Section P M Thomas
Ia/3/2024 Classification : Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/4/2024 Classification : Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Section Saji ChackoP M Thomas
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Amendment Application Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Amendment Application Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Amendment Application Section P M ThomasSaji Chacko
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section Saji ChackoP M Thomas

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P M Thomas

    Adv. JOSE JOSEPH K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saji Chacko Advocate - P S Vishnu

  2. 2.Biju Chacko

    Adv. P S Vishnu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: P M Thomas v. Saji Chacko Advocate & Biju Chacko (CMA 88/2022) The Additional District Judge dismissed P M Thomas's appeal against the trial court's rejection of his injunction petitions. The court found that Thomas failed to establish exclusive possession of the disputed property, as his own title deed recognized the 1.74 Ares portion as a shared pathway with common utility rights under joint "Oodukkoor" holding. Additionally, the court identified critical defects: property identity remained unclear due to survey discrepancies and the non-joinder of K.V. George (a necessary party still paying taxes on overlapping land), and photographic evidence did not clearly establish who demolished the compound wall. The court upheld the dismissal, holding that all three pillars of injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury) were unsatisfied, and reserved final adjudication for full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Adjourned

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  14. 16-Jan-2026

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  16. 11-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  17. 10-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  18. 27-Nov-2025

    For Objection and Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  19. 20-Nov-2025

    For Objection and Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  20. 15-Nov-2025

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    Return for Curing Defect

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  22. 25-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  23. 23-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  24. 23-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  25. 10-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  26. 02-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  27. 29-May-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  28. 07-Apr-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  29. 24-Mar-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  30. 24-Feb-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  31. 30-Jan-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  32. 09-Jan-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  33. 04-Jan-2025

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  34. 18-Dec-2024

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  35. 11-Dec-2024

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  36. 27-Nov-2024

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  37. 13-Nov-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  38. 09-Oct-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  39. 05-Sep-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  40. 01-Aug-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  41. 28-Jun-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  42. 25-May-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  43. 05-Apr-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  44. 07-Mar-2024

    For Further Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  45. 07-Feb-2024

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  46. 14-Nov-2023

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  47. 21-Sep-2023

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  48. 01-Aug-2023

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  49. 14-Jul-2023

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  50. 22-May-2023

    Call with IA

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  51. 03-Jan-2023

    Call On

    Addl. District and Session Judge-IV / Addl MACT-II, Kottayam

  52. 26-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 24-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100088/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P M Thomas v. Saji Chacko Advocate & Biju Chacko (CMA 88/2022) The Additional District Judge dismissed P M Thomas's appeal against the trial court's rejection of his injunction petitions. The court found that Thomas failed to establish exclusive possession of the disputed property, as his own title deed recognized the 1.74 Ares portion as a shared pathway with common utility rights under joint "Oodukkoor" holding. Additionally, the court identified critical defects: property identity remained unclear due to survey discrepancies and the non-joinder of K.V. George (a necessary party still paying taxes on overlapping land), and photographic evidence did not clearly establish who demolished the compound wall. The court upheld the dismissal, holding that all three pillars of injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury) were unsatisfied, and reserved final adjudication for full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case