Anjana Ravi vs Sasikala Advocate - RAGHAVNATH SREEDHAR — 152/2025

Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 7 ,8,9,10 and 29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

OP - ORIGINAL PETITION

CNR: KLKT010036672025

Case disposed

Filing Number

661/2025

Filing Date

22-10-2025

Registration No

152/2025

Registration Date

23-10-2025

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT Section 7 ,8,9,10 and 29
IA/1/2025 Classification : Petition For Paper Publication Section Anjana RaviSasikala
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Permission To Produce Documents Section Anjana RaviSasikala

Petitioner(s)

Anjana Ravi

Adv. HARIKRISHNAN S

Respondent(s)

Sasikala Advocate - RAGHAVNATH SREEDHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam

10-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order/Judgement

04-04-2026

Order/Judgement

01-04-2026

For Further Hearing

28-03-2026

For Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: OP No. 152/2025 — Anjana Ravi v. Sasikala Advocate The Kottayam District Court granted Anjana Ravi permission to sell her minor children's inherited property shares to discharge her deceased husband's ₹44.49 lakh bank debt. The court found necessity justified the sale and imposed safeguards: the mother must execute a ₹10 lakh bond and deposit the minors' sale proceeds in fixed deposits until they reach majority, with court approval required for the sale deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OP No. 152/2025 — Anjana Ravi v. Sasikala Advocate The Kottayam District Court granted Anjana Ravi permission to sell her minor children's inherited property shares to discharge her deceased husband's ₹44.49 lakh bank debt. The court found necessity justified the sale and imposed safeguards: the mother must execute a ₹10 lakh bond and deposit the minors' sale proceeds in fixed deposits until they reach majority, with court approval required for the sale deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case