ITI Finance Limited vs Nirmal C Ani Advocate - KRISHNAKUMAR P V — 124/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 30th March 2026.

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLKT010036612025

Case disposed

Filing Number

665/2025

Filing Date

18-10-2025

Registration No

124/2025

Registration Date

23-10-2025

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 9
IA/1/2025 Classification : Application For Attachment Section ITI Finance Limited
IA/2/2025 Classification : Sanction Petition Section ITI Finance Limited

Petitioner(s)

ITI Finance Limited

Adv. Sethu S Krishna

Respondent(s)

Nirmal C Ani Advocate - KRISHNAKUMAR P V

Animon M Mani

Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR P V

Madhusoodanan

Adv. KRISHNAKUMAR P V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

30-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Report on Mediation

23-02-2026

Report on Mediation

23-01-2026

Report on Mediation

16-01-2026

Appearance of Parties

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: M.A. (Arb.) No. 124/2025 The Principal District Judge, Kottayam closed the petition filed by ITI Finance Limited under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against three respondents. The court withdrew the interim attachment that had been passed 90 days prior (27.10.2025), noting that arbitration proceedings had commenced and a settlement memo was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A. (Arb.) No. 124/2025 The Principal District Judge, Kottayam closed the petition filed by ITI Finance Limited under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against three respondents. The court withdrew the interim attachment that had been passed 90 days prior (27.10.2025), noting that arbitration proceedings had commenced and a settlement memo was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case