Anandhan vs Gireesh Advocate - MURALEEDHARAN P K — 57/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 104 and Order XLIII Rule 1(r). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLKT010036362025
Filing Number
637/2025
Filing Date
21-10-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
22-10-2025
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anandhan
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Kunjumani
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Arun
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Ranesh
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Sudheesh @ Vavachi
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Nithin
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Binoy
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Amal
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Abhilash
Adv. SAJAN VARGHESE A
Respondent(s)
Gireesh Advocate - MURALEEDHARAN P K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam
Disposed
For Further Hearing
For Further Hearing
For Further Hearing
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 57/2025 Summary The Additional District Judge dismissed civil appeals filed by defendants (Anandhan, Kunjumani, Arun, and others) challenging a temporary injunction order that restrained them from widening a 3-foot pathway on the plaintiff Gireesh's property. The court found the defendants failed to prove that the plaintiff voluntarily surrendered land to the Panchayat or that proper legal procedures under the Panchayat Raj Act were followed; the commissioner's report confirmed the pathway was newly constructed by dumping soil, and no authentic documents demonstrated the property's vesting with the Panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 57/2025 Summary The Additional District Judge dismissed civil appeals filed by defendants (Anandhan, Kunjumani, Arun, and others) challenging a temporary injunction order that restrained them from widening a 3-foot pathway on the plaintiff Gireesh's property. The court found the defendants failed to prove that the plaintiff voluntarily surrendered land to the Panchayat or that proper legal procedures under the Panchayat Raj Act were followed; the commissioner's report confirmed the pathway was newly constructed by dumping soil, and no authentic documents demonstrated the property's vesting with the Panchayat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts