Jose Mathew vs Antony Panamthottam — 100016/2024
Case under Building (lease and Rent Control )act, 1959 Section 18. Disposed: Contested--APPEAL ALLOWED on 21st May 2026.
RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)
CNR: KLKT010029842024
e-Filing Number
07-08-2024
Filing Number
100923/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
100016/2024
Registration Date
08-08-2024
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam
Decision Date
21st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPEAL ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jose Mathew
Adv. Karjet Koduvath
Dr K J Mathew
Adv. Karjet Koduvath
Respondent(s)
Antony Panamthottam
Aleykutty Joseph
MerlizStanely
Rani Xavier
Jancy Jose
Jose Joseph
Kuruvilla Joseph
John Joseph
Mathew Joseph
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For Hearing
For Hearing
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | For Hearing |
| 18-04-2026 | For Hearing |
| 06-04-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's dismissal of the rent control petition. The court held that a single petition seeking both fixation of fair rent under Section 5(1) and eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act is maintainable and does not constitute misjoinder of causes of action, relying on established High Court precedents allowing combined reliefs when fair rent is sought only until the eviction order date. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's dismissal of the rent control petition. The court held that a single petition seeking both fixation of fair rent under Section 5(1) and eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act is maintainable and does not constitute misjoinder of causes of action, relying on established High Court precedents allowing combined reliefs when fair rent is sought only until the eviction order date. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts