Geogy Joseph vs Sini Jiji Advocate - K.Madhavan Pillai — 43/2025

Case Summary: CMA No. 43/2025 Court Decision: The Principal District Judge set aside the trial court's order granting temporary prohibitory injunction to the plaintiffs and instead granted a temporary mandatory injunction directing the first plaintiff and her children to vacate the disputed property. The court found that the plaintiffs (Sini Jiji and Jiji George Joseph) lacked a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants. Key factors included the second plaintiff's earlier admission in a partition suit that the building belonged solely to the first defendant, the first plaintiff's unexplained absence in South Africa until May 2024, and evidence that the plaintiff entered the property only after obtaining the injunction order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.