Geogy Joseph vs Sini Jiji Advocate - K.Madhavan Pillai — 42/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order XLIII Rule 1 (r),Section 104. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLKT010026932025

Filing Number

622/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

14-Aug-2025

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order XLIII Rule 1 (r),Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Geogy Joseph

    Adv. AGI JOSEPH

  2. 2.K C Thomas

    Adv. AGI JOSEPH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sini Jiji Advocate - K.Madhavan Pillai

  2. 2.Jiji George Joseph

    Adv. K.Madhavan Pillai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 42/2025 The District Court reversed the trial court's temporary injunction protecting a woman from eviction, finding she lacked a prima facie case and had likely gained unlawful entry post-litigation. The court held that the building was solely owned by the defendant under a prior settlement deed, which the plaintiff's husband had never contested in an earlier partition suit—making her subsequent competing claim untenable. The court ordered the plaintiff and her children to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  11. 14-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  12. 27-Nov-2025

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 42/2025 The District Court reversed the trial court's temporary injunction protecting a woman from eviction, finding she lacked a prima facie case and had likely gained unlawful entry post-litigation. The court held that the building was solely owned by the defendant under a prior settlement deed, which the plaintiff's husband had never contested in an earlier partition suit—making her subsequent competing claim untenable. The court ordered the plaintiff and her children to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case