Lukson Francis Augustine vs Fr. George Joseph Advocate - SAJI S NAIR — 100016/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderXLIIIRule1(d). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th April 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLKT010019962023
e-Filing Number
25-03-2023
Filing Number
100815/2023
Filing Date
27-03-2023
Registration No
100016/2023
Registration Date
27-03-2023
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lukson Francis Augustine
Adv. JEROME P.J, JEROME P.J
Respondent(s)
Fr. George Joseph Advocate - SAJI S NAIR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For Further Hearing
For Hearing
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 20-04-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 17-04-2026 | For Hearing |
| 06-04-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 100016/2023 - Summary Petitioner: Lukson Francis Augustine Respondent: Fr. George Joseph Advocate The court dismissed both civil miscellaneous appeals filed by the defendant, finding them unmaintainable under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of CPC and rejecting his delay condonation plea. The defendant failed to satisfactorily explain the 1,695-day delay in filing an application to restore his earlier dismissed application to set aside an ex-parte decree in a foreign judgment enforcement suit, despite claiming he was unaware of orders while in the UK. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 100016/2023 - Summary Petitioner: Lukson Francis Augustine Respondent: Fr. George Joseph Advocate The court dismissed both civil miscellaneous appeals filed by the defendant, finding them unmaintainable under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of CPC and rejecting his delay condonation plea. The defendant failed to satisfactorily explain the 1,695-day delay in filing an application to restore his earlier dismissed application to set aside an ex-parte decree in a foreign judgment enforcement suit, despite claiming he was unaware of orders while in the UK. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts