Merchant Association vs Bino Raghavan Advocate - JAISON PALIYIL — 100029/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLKT010017932025

For Hearing

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-05-2025

Filing Number

100494/2025

Filing Date

21-05-2025

Registration No

100029/2025

Registration Date

21-05-2025

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order43
IA/1/2025 Classification : Section nullnull

Petitioner(s)

Merchant Association

Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R

S Rajeev

Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R

Tomy Abraham

Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R

Respondent(s)

Bino Raghavan Advocate - JAISON PALIYIL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam

02-06-2026

For Hearing

16-03-2026

For Hearing

12-01-2026

For Hearing

15-12-2025

For Hearing

21-11-2025

Await LCR

Interim Orders

10-09-2025
Order

Case 100029/2025 Summary: The Principal District Judge, Kottayam granted the Merchant Association and its representatives' petition to condone a 50-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay due to the counsel's illness (chickenpox) and subsequent court vacation, rejecting the respondent's claim of willful negligence. The petition was allowed subject to the petitioners paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 100029/2025 Summary: The Principal District Judge, Kottayam granted the Merchant Association and its representatives' petition to condone a 50-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay due to the counsel's illness (chickenpox) and subsequent court vacation, rejecting the respondent's claim of willful negligence. The petition was allowed subject to the petitioners paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case