Merchant Association vs Bino Raghavan Advocate - JAISON PALIYIL — 100029/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLKT010017932025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-05-2025
Filing Number
100494/2025
Filing Date
21-05-2025
Registration No
100029/2025
Registration Date
21-05-2025
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Merchant Association
Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R
S Rajeev
Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R
Tomy Abraham
Adv. JAYAKRISHNAN R
Respondent(s)
Bino Raghavan Advocate - JAISON PALIYIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
For Hearing
For Hearing
For Hearing
For Hearing
Await LCR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | For Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | For Hearing |
| 12-01-2026 | For Hearing |
| 15-12-2025 | For Hearing |
| 21-11-2025 | Await LCR |
Interim Orders
Case 100029/2025 Summary: The Principal District Judge, Kottayam granted the Merchant Association and its representatives' petition to condone a 50-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay due to the counsel's illness (chickenpox) and subsequent court vacation, rejecting the respondent's claim of willful negligence. The petition was allowed subject to the petitioners paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 100029/2025 Summary: The Principal District Judge, Kottayam granted the Merchant Association and its representatives' petition to condone a 50-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay due to the counsel's illness (chickenpox) and subsequent court vacation, rejecting the respondent's claim of willful negligence. The petition was allowed subject to the petitioners paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts