Nisha K vs K M Arun — 100026/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED IN PART on 31st March 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLKT010006592024
e-Filing Number
15-02-2024
Filing Number
100482/2024
Filing Date
16-02-2024
Registration No
100026/2024
Registration Date
16-02-2024
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED IN PART
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nisha K
Adv. ALEX THOMAS
Minor
Adv. ALEX THOMAS
Minor
Adv. ALEX THOMAS
Respondent(s)
K M Arun
K Muthaiya
Leela
K M Ajeesh
K M Aneesh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 28-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 21-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 100026/2024 The appellate court partially allowed Nisha K's appeal against the trial court's maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court increased maintenance by awarding the mother ₹7,500 monthly (previously denied) alongside the ₹15,000 monthly for her two children, recognizing she cannot work due to caring for one child with autism. The court rejected claims for lump-sum medical expenses and back payments, finding the monthly maintenance adequate for interim relief until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 100026/2024 The appellate court partially allowed Nisha K's appeal against the trial court's maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court increased maintenance by awarding the mother ₹7,500 monthly (previously denied) alongside the ₹15,000 monthly for her two children, recognizing she cannot work due to caring for one child with autism. The court rejected claims for lump-sum medical expenses and back payments, finding the monthly maintenance adequate for interim relief until final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts