ITI Finance Limited vs Jaimon James — 25/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act - 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLKT010006292026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ITI Finance Limited

    Adv. Sethu S Krishna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaimon James

  2. 2.Jiji James

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: ITI Finance Limited v. Jaimon James & Jiji James (25/2026) The Principal District Judge, Kottayam closed the petition filed by ITI Finance Limited under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, directing that any interim order regarding vehicle repossession remain subject to the arbitrator's final decision. The respondents were served but remained absent during the final hearing on 21 May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  4. 18-May-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITI Finance Limited v. Jaimon James & Jiji James (25/2026) The Principal District Judge, Kottayam closed the petition filed by ITI Finance Limited under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, directing that any interim order regarding vehicle repossession remain subject to the arbitrator's final decision. The respondents were served but remained absent during the final hearing on 21 May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case