Mary Scaria vs Molly @ Mary Advocate - DEEPTHI G NAIR — 100020/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Return of Notice. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLKT010006152025
Next Hearing
06th August 2026
e-Filing Number
15-02-2025
Filing Number
100127/2025
Filing Date
17-02-2025
Registration No
100020/2025
Registration Date
17-02-2025
Court
Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam
Judge
3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mary Scaria
Adv. SURENDRAN K R
Selbimol Scaria
Adv. SURENDRAN K R
Respondent(s)
Molly @ Mary Advocate - DEEPTHI G NAIR
Thresiyamma P J @ Elsamma
Rosamma Paul
Mery
Binu
Bino
Bigosh
Biji
Bindhu
Moly Francis
Mery Kutty Joseph
Rosili Binoy
Sophiyamma Joseph
Snehamol Scaria
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - II (Spl.) / Addl. MACT-I, Kottayam
Return of Notice
Return of Notice
Call On
Return of Notice
Return of Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Return of Notice |
| 16-03-2026 | Return of Notice |
| 13-02-2026 | Call On |
| 13-01-2026 | Return of Notice |
| 29-11-2025 | Return of Notice |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case 100020/2025 - Scaria v. Molly @ Mary Advocate & Others The Principal District Judge of Kottayam allowed an application by petitioners Mary Scaria and Selvimol Scaria to condone a 36-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 16.12.2024. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the first petitioner's age-related health ailments and the second petitioner's work-related absence. The petition was granted subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 costs to the first respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case 100020/2025 - Scaria v. Molly @ Mary Advocate & Others The Principal District Judge of Kottayam allowed an application by petitioners Mary Scaria and Selvimol Scaria to condone a 36-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 16.12.2024. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the first petitioner's age-related health ailments and the second petitioner's work-related absence. The petition was granted subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 costs to the first respondent within ten days; failure to pay would result in dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts