Jose Thomas. D vs P.A.Prakash — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 43 RULE 1 (r). Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

For Hearing Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLKT010001242026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

Principal District & Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottayam

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 43 RULE 1 (r)
Insolvency Act 1955 (Kerala) Section SECTION 79

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jose Thomas. D

    Adv. NARENDRAKUMAR MADHAVAN NAIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.A.Prakash

  2. 2.Leena Jaimon

    Adv. GEORGEKUTTY C A

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam

  3. 22-May-2026

    Await Lcr

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Await Lcr

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I, Kottayam

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    With Connected Case

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 1/2026 Outcome: Petition allowed. The 97-day delay in filing a civil appeal was condoned by the District Judge. Petitioner Jose Thomas must pay ₹1,000 cost to respondent Leena Jaimon by April 4, 2026, or the petition will be dismissed. Reason: The court found sufficient cause for delay—petitioner received mistaken legal advice from his counsel that only a revision (not appeal) was available, causing the filing delay. The court applied liberal interpretation of "sufficient cause" under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to advance substantial justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Payment of Cost

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Call On

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kottayam

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1/2026 Outcome: Petition allowed. The 97-day delay in filing a civil appeal was condoned by the District Judge. Petitioner Jose Thomas must pay ₹1,000 cost to respondent Leena Jaimon by April 4, 2026, or the petition will be dismissed. Reason: The court found sufficient cause for delay—petitioner received mistaken legal advice from his counsel that only a revision (not appeal) was available, causing the filing delay. The court applied liberal interpretation of "sufficient cause" under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to advance substantial justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case