SHO, Aralam Police Station vs Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil — 210/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section sec.9(1),10,11(i) 11(iv),12. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN340000442025

Filing Number

10057/2025

Filing Date

26-Apr-2025

Registration No

210/2025

Registration Date

26-Apr-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur

Judge

1-Special Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

Aralam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section sec.9(1),10,11(i) 11(iv),12
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,126(2),351(3),232(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer), Aralam Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Special Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss

    Special Judge

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  13. 04-Feb-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  15. 14-Jan-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  17. 30-Dec-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  18. 30-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  19. 17-Dec-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  20. 10-Dec-2025

    Extension of remand

    Special Judge

  21. 26-Nov-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  22. 12-Nov-2025

    For production of accused

    Special Judge

  23. 04-Nov-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  24. 21-Oct-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  25. 07-Oct-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Special Judge

  26. 23-Sep-2025

    Further evidence

    Special Judge

  27. 09-Sep-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  28. 26-Aug-2025

    For preliminery hearing of charge

    Special Judge

  29. 12-Aug-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  30. 29-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  31. 25-Jul-2025

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  32. 17-Jul-2025

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  33. 10-Jul-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  34. 05-Jul-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  35. 26-Jun-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  36. 20-Jun-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  37. 16-Jun-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge

  38. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 26-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 210/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case