SHO, Aralam Police Station vs Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil — 210/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section sec.9(1),10,11(i) 11(iv),12. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS on 22nd April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN340000442025

Case disposed

Filing Number

10057/2025

Filing Date

26-04-2025

Registration No

210/2025

Registration Date

26-04-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur

Judge

1-Special Judge

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

Aralam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section sec.9(1),10,11(i) 11(iv),12
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,126(2),351(3),232(1)
Crl.MP/252/2025 Classification : Adjournment Application Section Pavins V MSHO, Aralam Police Station

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer), Aralam Police Station

Respondent(s)

Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Special Judge

22-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

07-04-2026

Call on

25-03-2026

For further hearing

18-03-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case