SHO, Aralam Police Station vs Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil — 210/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section sec.9(1),10,11(i) 11(iv),12. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS on 22nd April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN340000442025
Filing Number
10057/2025
Filing Date
26-Apr-2025
Registration No
210/2025
Registration Date
26-Apr-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur
Judge
1-Special Judge
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
Aralam Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer), Aralam Police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pavins V M Advocate - Sam Isaac Pothiyil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Special Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Call on
Special Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
For further hearing
Special Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Special Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Call on
Special Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss
Special Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
for evidence
Special Judge
-
30-Dec-2025
for evidence
Special Judge
-
30-Dec-2025
Disposed
Special Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
for evidence
Special Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Extension of remand
Special Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
For production of accused
Special Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
for evidence
Special Judge
-
21-Oct-2025
for evidence
Special Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
For production of documents/Affidavit
Special Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Further evidence
Special Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
for evidence
Special Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
For preliminery hearing of charge
Special Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Special Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
For framing charge
Special Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
For framing charge
Special Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
05-Jul-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Remand Extended
Special Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 210/2025
Case Summary: SC 210/2025 Court's Decision: The Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur convicted Pavins V M under sections 126(2) (wrongful restraint), 74 (outraging modesty), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha. The accused was sentenced to 1 month simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine for wrongful restraint, and 2 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine for each of the other two offences, with sentences running concurrently and ₹20,000 compensation awarded to the victim. Key Reasoning: The court found the victim's testimony credible and consistent, corroborated by her mother and school teacher. The accused, on bail in an earlier sexual assault case, violated bail conditions by restraining the 14-year-old victim on her way to school, grabbing her shoulder, and threatening to repeat sexual assault and kill her unless she withdrew the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts