State of Kerala (Police) vs Adarsh K K Advocate - Prajeesh K, MANU M — 143/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 12r/w11(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 30th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN340000392025
Filing Number
10052/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2025
Registration No
143/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur
Judge
1-Special Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
Kannavam Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. SHEENA P V(Spl. Public Prosecutor)
XXXXXXX
Adv. VINOD KUMAR CHAMBALON
Respondent(s)
Adarsh K K Advocate - Prajeesh K, MANU M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Sessions Case 143/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Mattannur acquitted 24-year-old Adarsh K K of charges under BNS sections 332(c), 75(1)(i)(2) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(i), 12 due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony, serious investigation irregularities including fabricated custody documentation, and failure to prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the victim's statement to police contradicted her magistrate statement regarding sexual assault allegations, and the investigating officer falsely documented arrest location as a bus shelter rather than the victim's home, fatally undermining prosecution credibility and case integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Sessions Case 143/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Mattannur acquitted 24-year-old Adarsh K K of charges under BNS sections 332(c), 75(1)(i)(2) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(i), 12 due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony, serious investigation irregularities including fabricated custody documentation, and failure to prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the victim's statement to police contradicted her magistrate statement regarding sexual assault allegations, and the investigating officer falsely documented arrest location as a bus shelter rather than the victim's home, fatally undermining prosecution credibility and case integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts