State of Kerala (Police) vs Adarsh K K Advocate - Prajeesh K, MANU M — 143/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 12r/w11(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN340000392025

Filing Number

10052/2025

Filing Date

25-Mar-2025

Registration No

143/2025

Registration Date

25-Mar-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Mattannur

Judge

1-Special Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

Kannavam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 12r/w11(1)
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 332(c),75.78

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

    Adv. SHEENA P V(Spl. Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.XXXXXXX

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR CHAMBALON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Adarsh K K Advocate - Prajeesh K, MANU M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: Sessions Case 143/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Mattannur acquitted 24-year-old Adarsh K K of charges under BNS sections 332(c), 75(1)(i)(2) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(i), 12 due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony, serious investigation irregularities including fabricated custody documentation, and failure to prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the victim's statement to police contradicted her magistrate statement regarding sexual assault allegations, and the investigating officer falsely documented arrest location as a bus shelter rather than the victim's home, fatally undermining prosecution credibility and case integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Special Judge

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss

    Special Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Special Judge

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Special Judge

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  15. 26-Nov-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  16. 18-Nov-2025

    For evidence

    Special Judge

  17. 22-Oct-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Special Judge

  19. 04-Oct-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  21. 01-Sep-2025

    For preliminery hearing of charge

    Special Judge

  22. 26-Aug-2025

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  23. 16-Jul-2025

    For appearance of the accused

    Special Judge

  24. 25-Jun-2025

    For appearance of the accused

    Special Judge

  25. 07-May-2025

    For production of accused

    Special Judge

  26. 19-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 25-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sessions Case 143/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Mattannur acquitted 24-year-old Adarsh K K of charges under BNS sections 332(c), 75(1)(i)(2) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(i), 12 due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony, serious investigation irregularities including fabricated custody documentation, and failure to prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the victim's statement to police contradicted her magistrate statement regarding sexual assault allegations, and the investigating officer falsely documented arrest location as a bus shelter rather than the victim's home, fatally undermining prosecution credibility and case integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case