S H O Irikkur vs Noorudheen K Advocate - Sanilkumar Edathil — 119/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 21st March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN310001572022

Filing Number

157/2022

Filing Date

01-Nov-2022

Registration No

119/2022

Registration Date

14-Nov-2022

Court

Gramnyayalaya Irikkur

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

21-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0639

Police Station

Irikkur Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 447,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S H O Irikkur

    Adv. A P P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Noorudheen K Advocate - Sanilkumar Edathil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Irikoor Village Court acquitted defendant Noordheen K of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing damage) in a case from September 15, 2022. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally entered the complainant's land and damaged a stone wall using an excavator, primarily due to lack of direct eyewitness testimony, unavailable CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated damage valuation by a private engineer. The defendant was discharged under Section 255(1) of CrPC, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Nyayadhikari

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Nyayadhikari

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Nyayadhikari

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  12. 15-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Nyayadhikari

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  21. 10-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  23. 27-May-2025

    repeat NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  24. 07-May-2025

    repeat NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  25. 23-Apr-2025

    repeat NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  26. 03-Apr-2025

    NBW to cws

    Nyayadhikari

  27. 07-Mar-2025

    Issue NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  28. 06-Dec-2024

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  29. 20-Sep-2024

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  30. 05-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari

  31. 12-Apr-2024

    Issue NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  32. 09-Feb-2024

    Bound over

    Nyayadhikari

  33. 15-Dec-2023

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  34. 20-Oct-2023

    Issue NBW

    Nyayadhikari

  35. 07-Sep-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  36. 27-Jul-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari

  37. 15-Jun-2023

    Accused absconding.Steps

    Nyayadhikari

  38. 11-May-2023

    Referred to Mediator

    Nyayadhikari

  39. 20-Apr-2023

    Issue Summons

    Nyayadhikari

  40. 09-Mar-2023

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari

  41. 19-Jan-2023

    Appearance of Accused

    Nyayadhikari

  42. 08-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 01-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Irikoor Village Court acquitted defendant Noordheen K of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing damage) in a case from September 15, 2022. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally entered the complainant's land and damaged a stone wall using an excavator, primarily due to lack of direct eyewitness testimony, unavailable CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated damage valuation by a private engineer. The defendant was discharged under Section 255(1) of CrPC, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case