S H O Irikkur vs Noorudheen K Advocate - Sanilkumar Edathil — 119/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 21st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN310001572022
Filing Number
157/2022
Filing Date
01-11-2022
Registration No
119/2022
Registration Date
14-11-2022
Court
Gramnyayalaya Irikkur
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
21st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
0639
Police Station
Irikkur Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S H O Irikkur
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Noorudheen K Advocate - Sanilkumar Edathil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 03-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Irikoor Village Court acquitted defendant Noordheen K of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing damage) in a case from September 15, 2022. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally entered the complainant's land and damaged a stone wall using an excavator, primarily due to lack of direct eyewitness testimony, unavailable CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated damage valuation by a private engineer. The defendant was discharged under Section 255(1) of CrPC, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Irikoor Village Court acquitted defendant Noordheen K of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing damage) in a case from September 15, 2022. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant illegally entered the complainant's land and damaged a stone wall using an excavator, primarily due to lack of direct eyewitness testimony, unavailable CCTV footage, and unsubstantiated damage valuation by a private engineer. The defendant was discharged under Section 255(1) of CrPC, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts