State of Kerala (Police) vs Sachin Chandran — 499/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354 D. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 24th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN290000902022
Filing Number
499/2022
Filing Date
08-Aug-2023
Registration No
499/2022
Registration Date
08-Aug-2023
Court
Fast Track special Court POCSO ,Taliparamba
Judge
1-Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
156
Police Station
PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sachin Chandran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Taliparamba acquitted Sachin Chandran E of charges under Section 354(D) IPC and POCSO Act 2012 (Sections 11(v) r/w 12 and 13(c) r/w 14) for allegedly creating and distributing morphed obscene photos of a 12-year-old girl. The court found critical procedural defects in the prosecution's digital evidence: WhatsApp and ISP tracking data lacked proper Section 63 BSA certificates, the morphing was never scientifically proven, and exact message transmission times were never established—making IP-based identification legally insufficient despite circumstantial indicators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
17-Apr-2026
Order/Judgement
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
21-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
12-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
06-Mar-2026
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
21-Feb-2026
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Feb-2026
Call on
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
12-Feb-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
07-Feb-2026
For Counter
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
24-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
22-Jan-2026
For Counter in IA
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
17-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
08-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
03-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
05-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
21-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
15-Nov-2025
No sitting notified
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
07-Nov-2025
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
24-Oct-2025
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
16-Oct-2025
For evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
03-Oct-2025
For evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
26-Sep-2025
No sitting notified
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
18-Sep-2025
For evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
01-Sep-2025
For evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
18-Aug-2025
Judge on leave / duty
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
28-Jul-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
16-Jul-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
02-Jul-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Jun-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
29-May-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
20-May-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
12-May-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
22-Apr-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
25-Mar-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
12-Mar-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
11-Feb-2025
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
23-Jan-2025
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
21-Jan-2025
Appearance of Accused
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
31-Dec-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
28-Nov-2024
For reports
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
23-Oct-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
10-Oct-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
18-Sep-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Aug-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
31-Jul-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
06-Jul-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
26-Jun-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
19-Jun-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
18-May-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
08-Apr-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
28-Feb-2024
Await report
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
23-Jan-2024
Call on
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
22-Dec-2023
BW to cws
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
08-Nov-2023
Issue Summons
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
26-Oct-2023
for evidence
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
05-Sep-2023
Hearing on Charge
Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
-
17-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 499/2022
Court Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Taliparamba acquitted Sachin Chandran E of charges under Section 354(D) IPC and POCSO Act 2012 (Sections 11(v) r/w 12 and 13(c) r/w 14) for allegedly creating and distributing morphed obscene photos of a 12-year-old girl. The court found critical procedural defects in the prosecution's digital evidence: WhatsApp and ISP tracking data lacked proper Section 63 BSA certificates, the morphing was never scientifically proven, and exact message transmission times were never established—making IP-based identification legally insufficient despite circumstantial indicators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts