State of Kerala (Police) vs Vinu Rajendran — 156/2025
Case under Ipc \ Section 450,376,376(2)(n),354. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 21st March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN290000852025
Filing Number
156/2025
Filing Date
23-08-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
23-08-2025
Court
Fast Track special Court POCSO ,Taliparamba
Judge
1-Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
Decision Date
21st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
1307
Police Station
ALACODE PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Vinu Rajendran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge (Fast Track Special Court)
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
for evidence
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 19-02-2026 | for evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Fast Track Special Court acquitted accused Vinu Rajendran of charges under IPC sections 450 (criminal trespass), 376(2)(n) (rape by deception of marriage), and 354A(1)(i)(2) (outraging modesty). The victim/PW1, the sole prosecution witness, retracted her allegations in court, categorically denying the accused committed sexual assault and testifying their relationship ended due to his infidelity, not criminal conduct. The court found the case was motivated by a grudge and held that the prosecution failed to present convincing evidence, resulting in the accused's acquittal and discharge of bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Fast Track Special Court acquitted accused Vinu Rajendran of charges under IPC sections 450 (criminal trespass), 376(2)(n) (rape by deception of marriage), and 354A(1)(i)(2) (outraging modesty). The victim/PW1, the sole prosecution witness, retracted her allegations in court, categorically denying the accused committed sexual assault and testifying their relationship ended due to his infidelity, not criminal conduct. The court found the case was motivated by a grudge and held that the prosecution failed to present convincing evidence, resulting in the accused's acquittal and discharge of bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts