Anjali N M vs Aswath Pulappadi — 27/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKN250002812025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
04-06-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
04-06-2025
Court
Gramnyayalaya, Iritty at Payam
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anjali N M
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KOOTHAMBETH KOYITTI
Eysal Aswath
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KOOTHAMBETH KOYITTI
Respondent(s)
Aswath Pulappadi
NANU
PRASANA
ASWATHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Case 27/2025 Summary The Gram Nyayalaya court partially allowed the interim maintenance application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and ordered the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner (wife) and her minor daughter from May 26, 2025, until further orders—reduced from the requested Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, balancing the wife's financial needs against the respondent's financial burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 27/2025 Summary The Gram Nyayalaya court partially allowed the interim maintenance application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and ordered the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner (wife) and her minor daughter from May 26, 2025, until further orders—reduced from the requested Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, balancing the wife's financial needs against the respondent's financial burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts