Anjali N M vs Aswath Pulappadi — 27/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLKN250002812025

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

27/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

04-06-2025

Court

Gramnyayalaya, Iritty at Payam

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Anjali N M

Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KOOTHAMBETH KOYITTI

Eysal Aswath

Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KOOTHAMBETH KOYITTI

Respondent(s)

Aswath Pulappadi

NANU

PRASANA

ASWATHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari

11-05-2026

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

27-04-2026

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

06-04-2026

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

16-03-2026

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

09-03-2026

Orders in IA

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Interim Order

Case 27/2025 Summary The Gram Nyayalaya court partially allowed the interim maintenance application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and ordered the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner (wife) and her minor daughter from May 26, 2025, until further orders—reduced from the requested Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, balancing the wife's financial needs against the respondent's financial burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 27/2025 Summary The Gram Nyayalaya court partially allowed the interim maintenance application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and ordered the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner (wife) and her minor daughter from May 26, 2025, until further orders—reduced from the requested Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, balancing the wife's financial needs against the respondent's financial burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Gramnyayalaya, Iritty at Payam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case