Shyni V K vs Ratheeshan V K Advocate - K Shaju — 26/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKN250001542022
Filing Number
153/2022
Filing Date
22-Aug-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
22-Aug-2022
Court
Gramnyayalaya, Iritty at Payam
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shyni V K
Adv. Manoj Peter
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ratheeshan V K Advocate - K Shaju
-
2.Rema V K
Adv. K Shaju
-
3.Danya K
Adv. K Shaju
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
29-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
25-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
10-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
27-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
16-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
28-Feb-2026
Await report
Nyayadhikari
-
10-Feb-2026
For appointing an interpreter
Nyayadhikari
-
05-Feb-2026
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
22-Jan-2026
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
07-Jan-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
31-Dec-2025
Payment of cost
Nyayadhikari
-
30-Dec-2025
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Dec-2025
Appearance of Petitioner
Nyayadhikari
-
06-Dec-2025
Appearance of Petitioner
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Nov-2025
Interim OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 26/2022 Outcome: The Gram Nyayalaya Iritty allowed Shyni V K's application to reopen evidence and examine an additional witness regarding alleged misappropriation of gold ornaments by respondent Ratheesan V K. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to respondents. The court found it necessary to examine the witness to enable proper adjudication of the dispute between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Nov-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Nov-2025
Orders in IA
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Oct-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Nyayadhikari
-
09-Oct-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Nyayadhikari
-
29-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Nyayadhikari
-
08-Sep-2025
Further evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
23-Aug-2025
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Aug-2025
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
01-Aug-2025
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
22-Jul-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Jul-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Jun-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
05-Jun-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
24-May-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
12-May-2025
To summon witness
Nyayadhikari
-
25-Apr-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
19-Apr-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
11-Apr-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
27-Mar-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
18-Mar-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
05-Mar-2025
For evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
08-Jan-2025
For Counter
Nyayadhikari
-
06-Nov-2024
For Counter
Nyayadhikari
-
11-Sep-2024
For production of documents/Affidavit
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Aug-2024
For production of documents/Affidavit
Nyayadhikari
-
07-Aug-2024
Odering Cmp
Nyayadhikari
-
25-Jul-2024
For Counter
Nyayadhikari
-
30-May-2024
For Counter
Nyayadhikari
-
17-Apr-2024
For Counter
Nyayadhikari
-
26-Mar-2024
for evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
21-Mar-2024
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
15-Mar-2024
Call on
Nyayadhikari
-
22-Dec-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
24-Nov-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
16-Aug-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Jul-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
31-May-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
02-May-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
29-Mar-2023
Return of notice
Nyayadhikari
-
18-Jan-2023
Await summons
Nyayadhikari
-
30-Nov-2022
Await summons
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Oct-2022
Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.
Nyayadhikari
-
24-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2022
Case Summary: 26/2022 Outcome: The Gram Nyayalaya Iritty allowed Shyni V K's application to reopen evidence and examine an additional witness regarding alleged misappropriation of gold ornaments by respondent Ratheesan V K. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to respondents. The court found it necessary to examine the witness to enable proper adjudication of the dispute between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts